ID:               39337
 Updated by:       [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Reported By:      phpbugs at thequod dot de
-Status:           Open
+Status:           Bogus
 Bug Type:         Arrays related
 Operating System: Ubuntu Linux
 PHP Version:      5CVS-2006-11-01 (CVS)
 New Comment:

Yes, I did see the comment. 
The point is that with $A->foo[] = 1; you call __get() first, which
returns NULL and you modify this temporary variable. That happens
because we need to get the array itself to be able to add an element,
but to create a variable directly (like $A->foo = 1) this is not
needed.



Previous Comments:
------------------------------------------------------------------------

[2006-11-08 23:18:36] phpbugs at thequod dot de

Ok. But haven't you seen the comment in __get()?

Here's another testcase, just returning an array now 
always and with further output, when __get() gets called:


Description:
------------
When using "array creating syntax" (like $a[] or $a[1]), 
__get() does not seem to work correctly, IF the var has 
not been defined using the "var" key for the class.

Reproduce code:
---------------
<?php

class A
{
        function __get($v)
        {
                // note: even returning array() here won't 
fix it  
        }
}


$A = new A();

$A->foo[1] = 1;
var_dump( $A->foo );

$A->foo[] = 2;
var_dump( $A->foo );

$A->foo['a'] = 3;
var_dump( $A->foo );

$A->foo = array();
var_dump( $A->foo );

$A->foo = 1;
var_dump( $A->foo );

?>

Expected result:
----------------
__get: foo
array(1) {
  1 => 1
}
array(2) {
  1 => 1,
  2 => 2
}
array(0) {
  1 => 1,
  2 => 2,
  'a' => 3
}
array(0) {
}
int(1)


Actual result:
--------------
__get: foo
__get: foo
array(0) {
}
__get: foo
__get: foo
array(0) {
}
__get: foo
__get: foo
array(0) {
}
array(0) {
}
int(1)

------------------------------------------------------------------------

[2006-11-08 17:40:51] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

It's not in the manual, because it's obvious - your __get() method does
nothing, so you get nothing as the result.

------------------------------------------------------------------------

[2006-11-08 17:30:53] phpbugs at thequod dot de

Sorry, it's not in the manual..

http://de.php.net/manual/en/language.oop5.overloading.php

Please re-classify as "documentation issue" at least, if you're sure
that it really is not a bug..

------------------------------------------------------------------------

[2006-11-08 14:10:52] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Thank you for taking the time to write to us, but this is not
a bug. Please double-check the documentation available at
http://www.php.net/manual/ and the instructions on how to report
a bug at http://bugs.php.net/how-to-report.php



------------------------------------------------------------------------

[2006-11-01 18:56:44] phpbugs at thequod dot de

A better workaround is, of course, to just define the 
member with "var" in the class header.

But it's still a bug IMHO.

------------------------------------------------------------------------

The remainder of the comments for this report are too long. To view
the rest of the comments, please view the bug report online at
    http://bugs.php.net/39337

-- 
Edit this bug report at http://bugs.php.net/?id=39337&edit=1

Reply via email to