ID:               40693
 User updated by:  stefan dot teleman at gmail dot com
 Reported By:      stefan dot teleman at gmail dot com
 Status:           Wont fix
 Bug Type:         Strings related
 Operating System: *
 PHP Version:      5.2.1
 New Comment:

Exactly what features or specific functionality does your strtok_r
provide that strtok_r implementations from Solaris or Linux or BSD or
Windows do not ?

None.

If you have identified a bug in any of these implementations of
strtok_r(3C), please identify the bug.

Duplicating Standard C Library all over the place just because "it
doesn't crash anymore if I do this" is not really a valid
justification.

Thank you.

Stefan Teleman


Previous Comments:
------------------------------------------------------------------------

[2007-03-02 19:58:11] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Usually reimplementation of a c library function means that we rely on
very specific functionality. Otfen in this cases many implementations
are simply plain wrong. This is true for a bunch of stuff where
werequire the C99 compliant implementation.

------------------------------------------------------------------------

[2007-03-02 17:22:40] stefan dot teleman at gmail dot com

Description:
------------
TSRM/tsrm_strtok_r.c reimplements strtok_r(3C) (php-5.2.0 and
php-5.2.1).

Please don't do this on Solaris. There is no reason to reimplement a
Standard C Library function.

diff -wu output included below.



Reproduce code:
---------------
--- tsrm_strtok_r.c.orig        2000-09-11 11:15:29.000000000 -0400
+++ tsrm_strtok_r.c     2007-03-02 03:25:44.953128000 -0500
@@ -16,6 +16,9 @@
 
 char *tsrm_strtok_r(char *s, const char *delim, char **last)
 {
+#if defined(SOLARIS)
+        return strtok_r(s, delim, last);
+#else
        char *token;
 
        if (s == NULL) {
@@ -41,6 +44,7 @@
                *last = s + 1;
        }
        return token;
+#endif
 }
 
 #if 0




------------------------------------------------------------------------


-- 
Edit this bug report at http://bugs.php.net/?id=40693&edit=1

Reply via email to