So we deal with those when we know about them.
Just commit.
--Jani
On Sat, 5 Apr 2003, Moriyoshi Koizumi wrote:
>I don't think it would fail in the recent systems, but as the APIs are a
>bit newer than the others, it's possible that the prototypes and structure
>definitions are kept in another header file.
>
>Moriyoshi
>
>Jani Taskinen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>
>> umm...why would it fail?
>>
>> --Jani
>>
>>
>> On Sat, 5 Apr 2003, Moriyoshi Koizumi wrote:
>>
>> >BTW can I merge my changes for the cygwin issue to the branch also?
>> >I'm rather hasitating to do so because the possible failure of detection
>> >might end up with a number of users' complaints
>> >like please-explain-why-socket_recvmsg-is-not-available-in-my-build..
>> >
>> >Moriyoshi
>> >
>> >"Jani Taskinen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >
>> >> sniper Fri Apr 4 10:42:54 2003 EDT
>> >>
>> >> Modified files:
>> >> /php4 configure.in
>> >> /php4/ext/sockets config.m4
>> >> Log:
>> >> - Checks specific to some extension belong in the extension's config.m4
>> >>
>> >
>>
>> --
>> <- For Sale! ->
>>
>>
>> --
>> PHP CVS Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
>> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
>>
>
--
<- For Sale! ->
--
PHP CVS Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
