Judging by the complete silence, looks like you have lazy consensus! :)

Zeev

At 17:40 07/07/2003, Derick Rethans wrote:
On Mon, 7 Jul 2003, Sascha Schumann wrote:

> sas           Mon Jul  7 10:39:03 2003 EDT
>
>   Modified files:              (Branch: PHP_4_3)
>     /php-src/ext/ircg ircg.c php_ircg.h
>   Log:
>   Add support for who/invite/notice/lusers
>   Add ircg_names/ircg_invite/ircg_lusers/ircg_oper/ircg_who/ircg_list
>
>   # feature patch applied to PHP_4_3 due to "won't be released status"
>   # of PHP_4 and HEAD being IRCG 3 incompatible.

Isn't it much better off in PECL, where you have full control over your
release cycle?

regards,
Derick

--
"Interpreting what the GPL actually means is a job best left to those
                    that read the future by examining animal entrails."
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Derick Rethans                                 http://derickrethans.nl/
 International PHP Magazine                          http://php-mag.net/
-------------------------------------------------------------------------


-- PHP CVS Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php


--
PHP CVS Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php



Reply via email to