LKS>>furthermore are you aware that there are several fixes that are also LKS>>not applied to 5.0.x (atleast I know for sure that several streams LKS>>fixes fall into this category). I really dont see the point in doing LKS>>more 5.0.x releases if they dont fix countless bugs that are marked LKS>>as "fixed in CVS".
I think developers which fix bugs should use their common sense to see if the bug is important enough. I understand that if there would be 5.0 release, it would be a bugfix release. So if the fix is about "this function misses this functionality" or "this function doesn't work in this borderline condition" - it's OK not to have it in 5.0 branch. But if the fix is for "serializing drops dead on any big-endian 64-bit platform" - this is a good candidate for the branch, since if someone would want to run PHP on 64-bit, he'd at least have a chance. And I don't think "go to 5.1" advice qualifies, as we don't even have single 5.1 release, let alone single 5.1 release that is tried by many users, as of now. -- Stanislav Malyshev, Zend Products Engineer [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.zend.com/ +972-3-6139665 ext.115 -- PHP CVS Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
