On Fri, 18 Nov 2005, Antony Dovgal wrote: > On 18.11.2005 18:08, Derick Rethans wrote: > > On Fri, 18 Nov 2005, Antony Dovgal wrote: > > > > > Not that I care, but if reflection could be disabled with --disable-all, > > > FreeBSD users will never be able to use it, as for some reason which I > > > can't > > > understand, maintainer of PHP port uses --disable-all and builds all > > > extensions as separate packages. > > > > If distributions screw up their packaging it is their fault - not ours. > > Exactly. > But we can think of making PHP a bit harder to screw up, right?
--disable-all is not meant for distributions, but they are find to shoot themselves in the foot. I don't see why we should try to prevent that. There is no reason why a distribution should use --disable-all and then compile everything shared. There is no reason for that. Derick -- Derick Rethans http://derickrethans.nl | http://ez.no | http://xdebug.org -- PHP CVS Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
