And another one seems to be ext/pdo/pdo_sql_parser.re.
Is there some reason not to have the build rules for these?

The generated .c files can still be committed and the -g for gcc 
forced in the Makefile.frag if re2c exists..

--Jani 

On Thu, 2007-06-07 at 08:06 +0200, Marcus Boerger wrote:
> Hello Jani,
> 
>   we have .re files that are being generated only manually. For one instance
> look into date lib.
> 
> best regards
> marcus
> 
> Thursday, June 7, 2007, 2:41:10 AM, you wrote:
> 
> > What do you mean with "not all .re files have rules" ??
> 
> > --Jani
> 
> > Marcus Boerger kirjoitti:
> >> Hello Nuno,
> >> 
> >>   not all .re files have rules. MAybe we could collect the .re files in the
> >> buildconf or configure process and automatically generate a makefile
> >> target re2c if re2c is available. This rulesset might as well check if we
> >> develop using gcc and pass -g to re2c in that case.
> >> 
> >> best regards
> >> marcus
> >> 
> >> Wednesday, June 6, 2007, 6:29:27 PM, you wrote:
> >> 
> >>> yep. letting 'make' regenerate the files should do the trick.
> >>> Thanks,
> >>> Nuno
> >> 
> >>> ----- Original Message ----- 
> >>>> I guess you need to generate the files the "correct way"  
> >>>> It should happen automatically when you do the test build..?  
> >>>> (just don't run re2c manually)
> >>>>
> >>>> --Jani
> >>>>
> >>>> Antony Dovgal kirjoitti:
> >>>>> On 06.06.2007 20:00, Ilia Alshanetsky wrote:
> >>>>>> Nuno,
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> What does the gcov build need that my re2c is not doing so that I can  
> >>>>>> fix it for the future.
> >>>>> Apparently it needs full path, not just filename.
> >> 
> >> 
> >> 
> >> 
> >> Best regards,
> >>  Marcus
> >> 
> 
> 
> 
> Best regards,
>  Marcus
> 

-- 
PHP CVS Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php

Reply via email to