Hi Marcus,
I'm pretty sure this is a wrong fix - the check for "not shared" replaces
the original check for HAVE_HASH_EXT, which is effectively a global
equivalent to $PHP_HASH. So it should be something like:
if test "$PHP_HASH" != "no"; then
if test "$PHP_HASH_SHARED" != "yes"; then
AC_DEFINE(PHAR_HASH_OK,1,[ ])
else
AC_MSG_WARN([Phar: sha256/sha512 signature support disabled if
ext/hash
is built shared])
fi
fi
As far as I can tell that acomplishes the same. Onlz zou
German kb? ;)
changed the
original logic a lot rather then trzing to keep as much of it as possible.
Nope. The *original* logic said 'is it there?' Greg changed that to 'is it
!shared?' You changed it back to 'is it there?' It needs to be 'is it there
&& !shared?'
The ext/hash files are already included as appropriate in phar_internal.h
and don't/shouldn't need re-including anywhere else.
Doesnät matter. This helps me figuring out what is wrong.
In CVS?
Also - it looks like ext/hash needs adding to phar_deps in phar.c (as
ZEND_MOD_OPTIONAL).
Zep, that's a good point.
And config.w32 needs updating to define PHAR_HASH_OK, since there'll be
zero
hash support under doze otherwise. HAVE_HASH_EXT is at least
automatic...!
Since I cannot test on windows I need windows developers like zou to fix
it.
I haven't been able to test 5.3 in months.. I'll fix/test/merge out of PECL
& 5.2 once it's working under *nix, but currently it doesn't seem to be
working anywhere :)
- Steph
--
PHP CVS Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
