Le 23 avril 2010 11:31, Derick Rethans <der...@php.net> a écrit :
> On Wed, 21 Apr 2010, Jérôme Loyet wrote:
>
>> fat                                      Wed, 21 Apr 2010 22:56:33 +0000
>>
>> Revision: http://svn.php.net/viewvc?view=revision&revision=298281
>>
>> Log:
>> switch the configuration syntax from xml to ini
>> It's been describe in the RFC: http://wiki.php.net/rfc/fpm/ini_syntax
>

Hi derick,

> I feel extremely unhappy about this patch. From what I've seen there is
> only a very small group of people that want to switch from the XML
> format to the INI format. Another group, was opposed to this move. I for
> one, find this new INI stuff extremely complicated and annoying.

Please compare http://www.fatbsd.com/fpm/php-fpm.conf.ini and
http://www.fatbsd.com/fpm/php-fpm.conf.xml
Those 2 files have exactly the same values.

r...@raptor> wc php-fpm.conf.*
      33      28     683 php-fpm.conf.ini
      48      77    1554 php-fpm.conf.xml

Number of lines: 32% less lines in INI than XML
Number of words: 64% less words in INI than XML
Numbers of bytes: 57% less bytes in INI than XML

Do you really think XML is easier to read/right than INI ?


> Instead
> of a nice ordered XML file we now have a mess of INI files that makes me
> think of Windows 3.11.

So in your mind you want the php.ini to be changed to xml (php.xml) ?

It's not because something has been invented years ago that it's crap.
In this case, C is crap, and so on ...

++ Jerome

--
PHP CVS Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php

Reply via email to