Le 23 avril 2010 11:31, Derick Rethans <der...@php.net> a écrit : > On Wed, 21 Apr 2010, Jérôme Loyet wrote: > >> fat Wed, 21 Apr 2010 22:56:33 +0000 >> >> Revision: http://svn.php.net/viewvc?view=revision&revision=298281 >> >> Log: >> switch the configuration syntax from xml to ini >> It's been describe in the RFC: http://wiki.php.net/rfc/fpm/ini_syntax >
Hi derick, > I feel extremely unhappy about this patch. From what I've seen there is > only a very small group of people that want to switch from the XML > format to the INI format. Another group, was opposed to this move. I for > one, find this new INI stuff extremely complicated and annoying. Please compare http://www.fatbsd.com/fpm/php-fpm.conf.ini and http://www.fatbsd.com/fpm/php-fpm.conf.xml Those 2 files have exactly the same values. r...@raptor> wc php-fpm.conf.* 33 28 683 php-fpm.conf.ini 48 77 1554 php-fpm.conf.xml Number of lines: 32% less lines in INI than XML Number of words: 64% less words in INI than XML Numbers of bytes: 57% less bytes in INI than XML Do you really think XML is easier to read/right than INI ? > Instead > of a nice ordered XML file we now have a mess of INI files that makes me > think of Windows 3.11. So in your mind you want the php.ini to be changed to xml (php.xml) ? It's not because something has been invented years ago that it's crap. In this case, C is crap, and so on ... ++ Jerome -- PHP CVS Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
