From: Pierre Joye [pierre....@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2011 12:12 PM
To: Philip Olson
Cc: Hannes Magnusson; Peter Cowburn; PHP Documentation ML; Pierrick Charron; 
Subject: [PHP-DOC] Re: [PHP-CVS] [PHP-DOC] [PHP-CVS] svn: 
/php/php-src/branches/PHP_5_4/ UPGRADING

On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 7:04 PM, Philip Olson <phi...@roshambo.org> wrote:

> I cannot find a discussion or decision. An old patch was applied that
> lacked an associated RFC. People later noticed the E_DEPRECATED error,
> so it was removed. That's how I see it, at least,

We removed it because it makes no sense to have such a noise here,
that's not very developer friendly. But the function remains
deprecated and the related feature has been removed. Does that not
make sense to you to deprecate (in the doc only here, for the reason I
explained in here) a function related to a dead feature? If not then
I'm out of argument, sorry.


@pierrejoye | http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org
PHP CVS Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php

Reply via email to