On Mar 7, 2012, at 8:15 AM, Christopher Jones wrote:
> On 3/7/12 12:51 AM, Gustavo André dos Santos Lopes wrote:
>> cataphract Wed, 07 Mar 2012 08:51:30 +0000
>> Revision: http://svn.php.net/viewvc?view=revision&revision=323988
>> - Tentative fix for bug #61306.
>> #cjones: Will update NEWS when confirmed it fixes the problem.
>> Bug: https://bugs.php.net/61306 (Assigned) Segfault at end of request
>> Changed paths:
>> U php/php-src/branches/PHP_5_4/ext/zlib/zlib.c
>> U php/php-src/trunk/ext/zlib/zlib.c
> LOL! My gut feel says that NEWS should be kept in sync whenever code
> changes. It doesn't seem technically difficult. Keeping NEWS up to
> date avoids any bus-factor or memory-loss situations. If a bug fix is
> reverted, it's trivial to update NEWS again. NEWS comments can say
> "attempt to fix" or "unfinished" if there is some temporary
> uncertainty about a fix.
They don't call him Christopher NEWS Jones for nothin'. :)
PHP CVS Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php