On Sun, 2012-04-15 at 13:00 +0800, Laruence wrote: > On Sun, Apr 15, 2012 at 12:36 PM, Stas Malyshev <smalys...@sugarcrm.com> > wrote: > > Hi! > > > >>> I'm not sure this is a good idea - output buffers can include output > >>> functions IIRC, but you have already shut down modules. I would be very, > >> Stas, they are request shutdown, not module shutdown :) > > > > Request shutdown IIRC destroys functions and module's per-request data > > structures, which user-supplied output handlers may need. Did you check > > that user-supplied output handlers - especially those that use > > extensions and per-request data structures - actually work after this > > change? > > Ah, thanks, I got your point. but output handler is called in step 3: > /* 3. Flush all output buffers */ > > and as I said, all tests passed. > > anyway, you are right, we should be careful, I will double check it. :)
I can't find something that breaks, but we should be really really really really careful with this shutdown order. changes there caused trouble in the past and I rather have a error message from output buffers saying "output buffer can't be used in shutdown" than changing the order ... johannes > thanks > > > > -- > > Stanislav Malyshev, Software Architect > > SugarCRM: http://www.sugarcrm.com/ > > (408)454-6900 ext. 227 > > > > -- > Laruence Xinchen Hui > http://www.laruence.com/ > -- PHP CVS Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
