Hi Anatoliy,

I'v attached a patch to https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=62962,  
And I test it on the lastest mac os x 10.8 and 10.7, everything looks fine,  
anyway it behavior likes windows :)

Best,

Reeze Xia  

在 2012年9月3日星期一,下午9:43,Anatoliy Belsky 写道:

> Hi Xia,
>  
> ok, that might be also due to the ASM parts cause I get no issue with the
> non ASM version under windows. Nevertheless the test works with the
> corrupted data.
>  
> Unfortunately I've no macintosh to test that, may be you could fork that
> test for mac?
>  
> Cheers
>  
> Anatoliy
>  
> On Mon, September 3, 2012 13:58, Reeze Xia wrote:
> > Hi Anatoliy,
> >  
> > 在 2012年9月3日星期一,下午7:37,Anatoliy Belsky 写道:
> >  
> > > Commit: ff0aa24054c166de64993ef608ccbb8486c64ba5
> > > Author: Anatoliy Belsky <a...@php.net (mailto:a...@php.net)> Mon, 3 Sep 
> > > 2012
> > > 13:37:34 +0200
> > > Parents: 33db8c0ef6f46917349fbe07514a06f4f98bff85
> > > Branches: PHP-5.4 master
> > >  
> > > Link:
> > > http://git.php.net/?p=php-src.git;a=commitdiff;h=ff0aa24054c166de64993ef608ccbb8486c64ba5
> > >  
> > > Log:
> > > forked two tests for windows
> > >  
> > > * bug55544.phpt - VT vs. EXT at the start of the data block,
> > > but the data can still be decoded correctly
> > > * bug_52944.phpt works with the corrupted data and has some
> > > different out
> > >  
> > > Most likely the ASM optimization under windows is responsible
> > > for this behaviour.
> > >  
> > > Bugs:
> > > https://bugs.php.net/55544
> > >  
> > > Changed paths:
> > > A ext/zlib/tests/bug55544-win.phpt
> > > M ext/zlib/tests/bug55544.phpt
> > > A ext/zlib/tests/bug_52944-win.phpt
> > > M ext/zlib/tests/bug_52944.phpt
> > >  
> >  
> >  
> > https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=62962
> > It output :
> > '%'
> > 'C'
> >  
> > in OSX too, maybe due to the same reason :)
> > > --
> > > PHP CVS Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
> > > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
> > >  
> > >  
> > >  
> > >  
> > > 附件:
> > > - diff_ff0aa24054c166de64993ef608ccbb8486c64ba5.txt
> > >  
> >  
> >  
>  
>  
>  


Reply via email to