Hi! > Imho this should have been briefly discussed on internals beforehand. At > least to me this seems rather dubious (why is it needed? why are you > manually parsing a part of the DLL serialization?) and also clashes with > Stas' proposed changes to unserialize.
I don't remember any discussion and I think it's rather sad that we're back to "commit first, ask anybody else maybe" paradigm. There definitely should be notification on the list prior to changing API of one of the very frequently used functions in the core. -- Stanislav Malyshev, Software Architect SugarCRM: http://www.sugarcrm.com/ (408)454-6900 ext. 227 -- PHP CVS Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php