> Imho this should have been briefly discussed on internals beforehand. At
> least to me this seems rather dubious (why is it needed? why are you
> manually parsing a part of the DLL serialization?) and also clashes with
> Stas' proposed changes to unserialize.

I don't remember any discussion and I think it's rather sad that we're
back to "commit first, ask anybody else maybe" paradigm. There
definitely should be notification on the list prior to changing API of
one of the very frequently used functions in the core.
Stanislav Malyshev, Software Architect
SugarCRM: http://www.sugarcrm.com/
(408)454-6900 ext. 227

PHP CVS Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php

Reply via email to