I probably futs that all up, but the fixes are now in 5.4 and 5.5 branches.
I guess the norm is to commit to the lowest branch and merge upwards :?
On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 7:28 PM, Stanley Sufficool <ssuffic...@gmail.com>wrote:
> Correct, No BC breakage. I'm just new to git so I'm not familiar with how
> to commit to different branches.
> On Sun, Jun 2, 2013 at 10:53 PM, Stas Malyshev <smalys...@sugarcrm.com>wrote:
>> > Commit: 0e2bcf3373d914a215784c041a2a4c3b6afc2034
>> > Author: Stanley Sufficool <ssuffic...@php.net> Fri, 31 May
>> 2013 22:53:08 -0700
>> > Parents: d22c7368e77d3da464e66898e96c0457b6f2d672
>> > Branches: master
>> > Link:
>> Is there any reason for this not to go into 5.4/5.5? Seems to be a
>> bugfix which does not produce any BC-breaking changes, is it correct?
>> Stanislav Malyshev, Software Architect
>> SugarCRM: http://www.sugarcrm.com/
>> (408)454-6900 ext. 227