I see. Yes, I was referring to the PHP manual.
I will investigate the RFC manuals as well like you had noted.
No offense taken. Thank you for the clarification.
On Jul 3, 2011, at 6:07 PM, Stuart Dallas wrote:
On Sun, Jul 3, 2011 at 11:22 PM, Karl DeSaulniers
Actually that is what made me look into the PHP_EOL Stuart. Wanting
to do things right.
Did you not read my initial email? I am not suggesting anyone adopt
The question was directed to what the differences are so I COULD
learn the right way.
Being that this was something I got off a tutorial from an
accredited website, your saying that to the wrong person.
I went and read the manuals and am here now posting the question so
as to get the right direction.
I have heard the argument and actually agreed. It would be better
to use the PHP_EOL instead.
I have been directed in the right direction. So I will be changing
my code to reflect.
I meant no offence, I was simply responding to your comment:
"Also, It has worked for years with no problem and I would still
use it" ...and took it to mean you would have no issue with using
that code, so I thought it worth pointing out that the standards
exist for a reason.
In the name of clarification, the "manual" I was referring to is
the sum total of the RFCs that define the various protocols used on
the internet, not the PHP manual which I believe you think I meant.