I see. Yes, I was referring to the PHP manual.
I will investigate the RFC manuals as well like you had noted.
No offense taken. Thank you for the clarification.


On Jul 3, 2011, at 6:07 PM, Stuart Dallas wrote:

On Sun, Jul 3, 2011 at 11:22 PM, Karl DeSaulniers <k...@designdrumm.com> wrote:
Actually that is what made me look into the PHP_EOL Stuart. Wanting to do things right. Did you not read my initial email? I am not suggesting anyone adopt my code. The question was directed to what the differences are so I COULD learn the right way. Being that this was something I got off a tutorial from an accredited website, your saying that to the wrong person. I went and read the manuals and am here now posting the question so as to get the right direction. I have heard the argument and actually agreed. It would be better to use the PHP_EOL instead. I have been directed in the right direction. So I will be changing my code to reflect.

I meant no offence, I was simply responding to your comment: "Also, It has worked for years with no problem and I would still use it" ...and took it to mean you would have no issue with using that code, so I thought it worth pointing out that the standards exist for a reason.

In the name of clarification, the "manual" I was referring to is the sum total of the RFCs that define the various protocols used on the internet, not the PHP manual which I believe you think I meant.


Stuart Dallas
3ft9 Ltd

Karl DeSaulniers
Design Drumm

Reply via email to