It probably should go in, but it is doing ok as a standalone extension.
It builds easily and the author can maintain his own release schedule.
-Rasmus
On Wed, 21 Mar 2001, Mike Robinson wrote:
>
> Rasmus Lerdorf writes:
>
> > Because it didn't work, and the ImageMagick library is absolutely
> > horrible. Have a look at the Imlib2 extension.
> >
> > -Rasmus
>
> I surprised imlib2 hasn't made it into the php source.
> It is quite nice.
>
> Perhaps its time it graduated. :)
>
> .mike
>
>
>
> > On Wed, 21 Mar 2001, [iso-8859-1] Ragnar Kjørstad wrote:
> >
> > > Hi
> > >
> > > I see there is a Image Magick module for php3 but not php4.
> > > Why was it removed?
> > >
> > > Is there any work in progress for reimplementing it?
> > > (we need it badly, and will considder joining the development)
>
--
PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/>
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To contact the list administrators, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
