I think the timestamp idea is the better of the two, myself. :)

On Tue, 10 Apr 2001, Jani Taskinen wrote the following to [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> >X-Powered-By: PHP/4.0.6-dev
> 
> Just an idea..would it be stupid to have the date of last
> CVS update included in the version string? Like this:
> 
> 4.0.6-dev-20011004
> 
> Or maybe the timestamp would be better?
> That way we could ask for it to be included in the bug report
> if the bug submitter uses CVS. And could tell for sure
> if a fix was in that version or not?
> 
> --Jani
> 
> 
> 


-- 
PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/>
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To contact the list administrators, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to