What about using the acronyms in any combination.....
like $_GPC
and $_GC
and etc....
-Jason
----- Original Message -----
From: "Cynic" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Jani Taskinen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Zeev Suraski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2001 1:25 PM
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: The new $_GET/POST/ENV (was: Re: [PHP-CVS] cvs: php4 /
NEWS...)
> At 20:14 8/8/2001, Jani Taskinen wrote the following:
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> >On Wed, 8 Aug 2001, Cynic wrote:
> >
> >>How about $_DONT_TOUCH_THIS ? :)
> >>Seriously though, I vote for $_REQUEST. After all, it contains
> >>data which is (generally) tied to one particular request...
> >
> >This reminds me that should the $_FILES be included in this
> >data too? As it's also something you shouldn't trust and
> >it's also coming from the user.
> >
> >--Jani
>
> Yeah. And $_SESSION too.
>
>
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> -------------
> And the eyes of them both were opened and they saw that their files
> were world readable and writable, so they chmoded 600 their files.
> - Book of Installation chapt 3 sec 7
>
>
> --
> PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/>
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To contact the list administrators, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
--
PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/>
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To contact the list administrators, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
