What about "." then (Java/Delphi)? --Wez.
On 09/30/01, "Andi Gutmans" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Well the difference is that C++ can figure out what to do at compile-time. > I don't think we can which means that it would put more logic into run-time > which is a bad thing IMO (especially for something new like this). > Or can you think of a way to differ between these at compile-time? > Andi > > At 09:56 PM 9/30/2001 +0200, Zeev Suraski wrote: > >:: is taken, but why not do it the C++ way? It also uses :: for both > >classes and namespaces. -- PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To contact the list administrators, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
