> It would mean we'd need to have nested classes. or limit namespaces to only contain classes:
<namespace>::<namespace>::<...>::<class>::method(); is there a reason why a namespace should contain anything other than classes ? we have static functions and static members in classes, no need for them in namespaces too. we can still have classes and namespaces with the same name this way, because a namespace must always be followed by at least one '::' and there is no Foo::bar() class/namespace ambiguity because a namespace can't contain a function. harald. -- PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To contact the list administrators, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
