John Lim ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > My suspicion is that persistent resources are only cleaned up when the child > process dies, while non-persistent resources are closed immediately at the > end of the page/script. Does anyone know the correct answer?
Correct. > If you can spare the time, I would be grateful for an answer to the > following questions too: > > 2. If resources are not cleaned up until the apache child process dies, what > will happen in multi-threaded servers like Apache 2 and IIS? I don't know. The Right Thing To Do would be to use a connection pool, with the connection resource "borrowed" by scripts, then released when they're done. AOLServer does this. > 3. Are persistent resources locked exclusively by an executing script until > the script completes when the resources become available for other scripts, > or can persistent resources be shared by multiple concurrent scripts? This question doesn't make sense in the current apache architecture. Each apache child gets its own persistent connections, which are not shared with other apache children. -Steve -- PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To contact the list administrators, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
