Hi Andrei! On Tue, 02 Oct 2001, Andrei Zmievski wrote: > On Tue, 02 Oct 2001, Jason Greene wrote: > > This easy to understand, efficient (no time consuming code to interpret whether > > a class was intended), no backwards compatibility issues, > > no ambiguity, and its not the first 3 symbol operator to hit php. > > Yeah, I wonder what we'll be saying when 4- and 5-symbol operators come > along.. %%:.. > Jumping into discussion...
How about `@'. Everybody reads it as `at' so FOO@Namespace reads quite familiar, and it doesn't mess with `supress warnings' that much cause you can make a difference very easily (any other character before it?). Still, I wonder how much runtime overhead can `::' bring, and how complicated it would be to implement namespaces as classes (it was a proposal some time ago, IIRC). -- teodor -- PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To contact the list administrators, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
