I apologize for the late reply, my time for the last month has been consumed by
employer issues. Things should be getting back to normal again soon. I am
a major +1 on the cli, though I have some concerns about pcntl being enabled by
default.

Currently, my signal trapping method uses a handler that is not intended for the 
way I am using it. I use the debug statement handler, which generates a performance
 impact. (Though I have not measured it) Quite a while ago, I had discussed briefly
with Andi, and Zeev about using a better hook. I was mainly after some form of a call 
back in the main execute loop. It was suggested that I could use ticks, but I do not 
think
this is a good idea because it would make signals and ticks incompatible with each 
other.

The signal replay code is as efficient as I could make it, so I do not think it would 
cause 
to much of a performance hit if it had a way into the loop. If it is undesirable, we 
could
only impact the execute loop if the cli (or maybe even cgi) sapi is chosen. I could do 
some 
test cases if that would help. Zeev, Andi What do you think?

I am up to discussion on this, so any ideas would help.

Thanks,
-Jason



----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Stig S. Bakken" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Andrei Zmievski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, October 15, 2001 7:05 PM
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] always building executable


> "Stig S. Bakken" wrote:
> > 
> > Andrei Zmievski wrote:
> > >
> > > On Mon, 15 Oct 2001, Stig S. Bakken wrote:
> > > > If you make it a normal extension, and you don't have --enable-pcntl in
> > > > your configure line, the right thing would be to include it in the cli
> > > > version but not the apache version or whatever.  So either we need a
> > > > mechanism for conditionally including extensions in a build (ka-yuck),
> > > > or it has to be moved.
> > >
> > > But what about other extensions that only make sense with cli version,
> > > like readline?
> > 
> > Hm, good point, there are lots of these.  So basically we need another
> > library aside libphp4.la for each sapi backend, and put the extensions
> > in question into the right one of these.
> 
> That was really a write-only reply. :-)
> 
> What I mean is something like this (SAPI means selected SAPI backend):
> 
> libphp4core.la         - "core" library (main, libs, expat, regex etc)
> libphp4ext.la          - extensions in all sapi backends
> libphp4ext_apache.la   - extensions for use with sapi/apache
> sapi/apache/libphp4.la - final Apache library
> 
>  - Stig
> 
> -- 
> PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/>
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To contact the list administrators, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 


-- 
PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/>
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To contact the list administrators, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to