Jani Taskinen wrote:
> I'd rather see these magic hacks to be removed altogether..
> +1 for removing short-tags and the hacks.
>
These aren't hacks from a technical perspective.
I personally am also for <?php= ?> its quite useful as a
shortcut instead of <?php echo ?>, i don't see what's hacky
about this (plus sometimes you need to write hacky code just to
get something simple done).
-Sterling
> --Jani
>
>
> On Fri, 26 Oct 2001, Derick Rethans wrote:
>
>
>>On Fri, 26 Oct 2001, Edin Kadribasic wrote:
>>
>>
>>>>The only possible valid point here is that the character encoding
>>>>specification in XHTML uses <?xml version=... encoding=...?> although this
>>>>can also be done through a <meta http-equiv...> tag so it is quite
>>>>possible to write perfectly valid XHTML without forcing people to use
>>>><?php ...?> everywhere.
>>>>
>>>If you want your PHP code to work everywhere you need to use <?php. I see no
>>>harm in allowing <?php= syntax (and would personally love to se Yasuo's
>>>patch applied).
>>>
>>+1 from me too, it's better then having to do: <?php echo $blaat; ?>
>>
>>Derick
>>
>>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> PHP: Scripting the Web - www.php.net - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> SRM: Site Resource Manager - www.vl-srm.net
>>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
--
PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/>
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To contact the list administrators, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
