On Wed, 31 Oct 2001 08:13:28 +0900
Yasuo Ohgaki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yasuo Ohgaki wrote:
>
> > Sterling Hughes wrote:
> >
> >> I don't know if this has been discussed yet, but while we're
> >> getting all
> >> crazy with breaking compat in 4.1 and/or 5.0, why not go ahead and
> >> finally fix empty("0") to return false, like it really should (a
> >> string with 0 in it, is *not* imho an empty string).
> >>
> >
> > $_POST/$_GET/$_COOKIE data has string type by default. It should return
> > false for empty("0"), I suppose...
>
>
> Oops. empty('0'). may return TRUE, since $_POST['var'] has string
> type...
:)) as I said ;). For post better to use !="" or isset($_POST['var']); if the post
:vars is empty. And "0" is not an empty string, it s a string containing one char (48
:?). If I m not too tired the post methods "post" all var even if they are empty.
imo :)
pa
--
PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/>
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To contact the list administrators, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
