James Moore wrote:

> 
> 
>>On Tue, 04 Dec 2001, Thies C. Arntzen wrote:
>>
>>>On Tue, Dec 04, 2001 at 09:04:29PM +0900, Yasuo Ohgaki wrote:
>>>
>>>>How about to have *new* list for sending patch for PHP?
>>>>PostgreSQL has list for that. It seems the list is working great
>>>>for them.
>>>>
>>>    php-dev is perfect for sending patches!
>>>    tc


Anyone can sent, but reply for posted patch is not good. It think 
one of the reason is the volume of the mails.

>>>
>>No, no. I suggest we split the list into extension specific lists. I
>>claim [EMAIL PROTECTED] and [EMAIL PROTECTED] Then we can
>>have *really* focused discussion. This php-dev deal just waters
>>everything down.

>>


I agree.

> 
> Only if youll spend the time subscribing me to them all.. I really dont have
> time to subscribe myself to 40 somthing lists :)
> 

I don't want to subscribe 40 mailing lists, but I'm fine with 400 
news groups. I guess many people prefer to subscribe mail instead 
of news.

Anyway, someone should be resposible for patches. Patches are 
always ignored for a while (some of them are ignored for good, it 
seems) You know there developers *complains* about it.

At least, patch sent to php-dev is *not* treated as nice as 
pgsql-patches.

-- 
Yasuo Ohgaki



-- 
PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/>
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To contact the list administrators, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to