it's kinda lame to create a yet another function when exit() already exists. After a while you have die(), exit(), exit_with_status(), silent_exit(), loud_exit(), etc. Maybe not *that* bad, but still exit is just as simple as... well, an exit. Unfortunately, it seems like there will be tons of ways to do a simple operation. Now, imagine you are just starting out with PHP - will you be looking for a whole array of exit() functions, or will you just try to use the one that seems to make sense, namely exit()?
It's not really just an exit() function issue - it is more a question of whether we will keep bloating php with more and more functions to save BC at any cost or we will draw a line somewhere. As it is right now, IMHO, exit with an error code is broken (I just can't see people needing that error code printed), and I really don't think that keeping BC intact to keep broken things working warrants creation of a new function, which mimicks the already existent function, except in a proper way. As far as the bigger picture, we have no guidelines as to what warrants breaking BC, and if fixing a broken behaviour constitutes breaking BC. Every time this comes up (and it has come up quite a bit lately), there is a big discussion, and the decision inevitably ends up being "we'll just break it at the next major/minor version". This is a good step, but (1) a new major version does not warrant breaking everything, (2) things that are totally wrong should get fixed ASAP, because they are already broken, and (3) you can not bloat a language indefinitely just for the sake of BC, because it ends up being *very* backwards compatible, and at the same time *very* cumbersome and harder to learn for new users. No, I don't have any suggestions as to what to do when those cases (like fixing exit()/ fixing docs/ bloating php) arise, but I do think that we can have some discussion about it and use it later as some sort of a precedent for these kinds of issues. :) (I'm a friendly guy, don't kill me for expressing my opinions) Vlad Zeev Suraski wrote: > exit_with_status(), silent_exit(), quiet_exit(), etc. etc. Something > should fit :) > > > At 14:49 19/12/2001, Lars Torben Wilson wrote: > >> Zeev Suraski writes: >> > At 14:04 19/12/2001, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> > >Two ways to fix it then, either update the manual, or fix exit(). >> I go for >> > >the last one then. Ppl who relied on the undocumented feature >> then, did >> > >simply the wrong thing. >> > >> > Only the documentation was wrong to begin with! A documentation >> bug should >> > not become a feature, especially when it never worked that way, so >> anybody >> > who actually used this function saw that it was behaving differently. >> > >> > Zeev >> >> Well, from another point of view, both were wrong. :) The manual >> documented behaviour which didn't exist, so it was wrong. In another >> sense, the code behaved in a fashion which had a very high WTF factor, >> so it couild be called 'wrong' too. >> >> An easy way to set and check the exit status of a PHP script would >> make a lot of life a hell of a lot easier. >> >> >> -- >> Torben Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> http://www.thebuttlesschaps.com >> http://www.hybrid17.com >> http://www.inflatableeye.com >> +1.604.709.0506 > > -- PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To contact the list administrators, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
