On Tue, 5 Feb 2002, Zeev Suraski wrote: > At 10:23 AM 2/5/2002, Derick Rethans wrote: > >On Tue, 5 Feb 2002, Zeev Suraski wrote: > > > > > That may be trickier. License wise, it's under a different license (we're > > > not in a position to change it, New Riders, Till and Tobias are). I also > > > think it makes sense to keep it in a different module (like the ZE/ZE2 > > > will, even though they'll be in the php.net CVS). The build can probably > > > change to automatically include this into the manual, and it should be > > > possible to note that this part is under a different OS license. > > > >The build process already works that way, but otherwise I think we just > >should ask New Riders if the licence can be changed is needed. > > It should be noted that I believe it'll be better for the manual to lose > the ugly license it's under and move to the openbook license, than the > other way around. But I've already done my share of license wars in my > life - if you want to talk to New Riders, go ahead.
Under which ugly licence is it now? =) I'm all for make sure these are compatible, so that the two repositories caan be merged. Derick -- PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
