Derick Rethans wrote: > On Sun, 3 Feb 2002, Yasuo Ohgaki wrote: > > Sometimes it takes a while for me to reply, but here it is :) > > >>Thanks. >>I feel it also. Although, I think are better to release 4.1.2 >>before 4.2.0. >> > > What _very_ critical fixes where done in the 4.1 branch? IMO, they > certaily do not need a new 'bug-fix' release as was needed for 4.1.0. > Therefore there shall not be an 4.1.2.
Not really. I'm one of them that hesitate to use any version end with 0 for production systems. I feel confortable Version X.X.2 or X.X.3, especially when I don't know anything about source code. Therefore, I feel needs for 4.1.2, since there are critical bugs in 4.1.1. Some of them are easily merged from HEAD. >>I wouldn't merge my massive PostgreSQL changes >>to release branch, but I would like to merge >>simple and critical bug fixes to relase branch. >> > > What do you define as critical exactly? For me it is a security problem, > or a major feature of PHP not working (ie. sessions or a bug in the MySQL > module which renders it totally useles.) For me, segfault, data loss, security problem, bugs that can lead really hard to find in a script, build problem, problems that have no workaround and makes PHP useless for certain job. There may be others. >>One think build error is ciritical, but others >>not :) >> > > I wasn't aware that it was a build error. In this case it should be merged > of course. > We can agree on this one. Probably other problems, too :) -- Yasuo Ohgaki _________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com -- PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
