** Reply to note from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun, 31 Mar 2002 13:06:11 +0200 (CEST) > > On Sat, 30 Mar 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > > Codenames are cool, but using our own names is no-so-cool. We should > > > > pick a theme though, but please not Australian wildlife (we're already > > > > using that for the alltheweb.com frontend ;-). > > > > -1 on code names at all. > > > > What came first woody or potatoe? You can't tell from the name. There > > is no doubt 4.2.0 is newer than 4.1.6. Why introduce unneeded > > ambiguity for those who don't follow PHP closely. > > Oh come on... some people just don't have any sense of humur at all. > Of couurse we wouldn't remove the version numbers altogether.
That's fine as long as version numbers get mentioned along with the code name. Every reference to Debian I see talks about just the code name which doesn't mean a thing to me. I've lost all interest in Debian because of it. Rick Rick Widmer Internet Marketing Specialists http://www.developersdesk.com -- PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
