On 4 Apr 2002, Jason Greene wrote: > Well it wouldn't be changing the behavior of the heredoc operator, it > would only be interpreted differently depending on the situation. > > Technically, I think it could be done without ambiguities.
I think it is a bad idea to have the same 'operator' used for multiple situations. We're not perl, are we? :) Derick > On Thu, 2002-04-04 at 09:57, Marc Boeren wrote: > > > Reasons expressed against it > > > ---------------------------- > > > It is the heredoc operator > > > > > however, I need a tie breaker. > > > > Is the heredoc operator not a tie breaker (or decision maker) on it's own? > > > > No need to change the behaviour of an existing operator just for > > consistency, is there? > > > > Cheerio, Marc. > -- > Jason T. Greene > Internet Software Engineer > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Use PHP: http://www.php.net > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------- PHP: Scripting the Web - [EMAIL PROTECTED] All your branches are belong to me! SRM: Script Running Machine - www.vl-srm.net ----------------------------------------------------------------------- -- PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
