At 01:22 10.04.2002, fabwash wrote: >Yes I agree to everything you say, I was just pointing out examples. How >many OO programmers understand OO ? !!!! Giving them rules to adhere to and >not letting them hack the language for their own benefit, just because they >don't understand the concept of the language is, to my view, better. I'm an >idealist I guess, but it comes from experience of fixing problems introduced >from people that have no idea of what they're doing.. Compare C++ code with >Java code, which one is harder to follow most of the time? >Fab.
Good question. I do much C/C++ but only sometimes Java so i know the first syntax better. But when templates, MI, COM interfaces, Operator overloading, properties (Borland CBuilder), namespaces and so on came in use it soon gets harder to understand. On the Java side the worst thing to say is that mostly you have to deal with very small classes that when starting code review seem to be of no context to the other classes. (One reason for the small classes is the lack of call by reference and structs so that has to be emulated with object passing). marcus. -- PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
