On Fri, 12 Apr 2002, Andi Gutmans wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I think that if we go my way with aggregation we can add the ability to add
> aggregated classes at run-time too and answer your needs.
Fine with me.
> However, I think that if we continue on much longer with trying to put all
> possible OOP features into Engine 2 it will never become a reality.
> I would like to make the aggregation patch the last thing in Engine 2 and
> then start working on testing it and working towards PHP 5.
> Otherwise we will never have a next version of PHP. There have been so many
> changes and lots of good changes we just can't do too much at once. We
> should do a feature freeze right after aggregation or we will be left with
> lots of discussions and ideas but no next version... It needs lots and lots
> of testing so that we can iron out all of the bugs.
> There can always be PHP 6 later on. I think feature wise the Engine 2 is a
> big step forward for PHP and we should try and get it out!
What about the thing that I've been asking for a long time now, a better
and more consistent way to specify function/method callbacks?
-Andrei
Linux is like living in a teepee.
No Windows, no Gates, Apache in house.
- Usenet signature
--
PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/>
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
