Assigning an object to a constant is, IMHO, abuse of constants. What
would you expect? An immutable object? You would probably be better
off making a function to clone your object or something like that.
- Stig
On Mon, 2002-04-15 at 02:52, medvitz wrote:
>
> Should it be the same object, though???
>
> I thought that the whole concept of a 'constant' was that it, well, was
> constant. Wouldn't it make more sense to auto-clone objects when they are
> accessed through a constant????
>
> Medvitz
>
>
> Zeev Suraski wrote:
>
> > It'll be the same object.
> >
> > At 17:33 14/04/2002, medvitz wrote:
> >
> >
> >>This may have been addressed already but:
> >>
> >>If I have the following code:
> >>
> >>class Beer
> >>{
> >> ...
> >>}
> >>
> >>$a = new Beer();
> >>
> >>define('BaseBeer', $a);
> >>
> >>$b = BaseBeer;
> >>
> >>
> >>Will $a & $b be the same object or will $b be a copy. (Under ZE2).
> >>
> >>
> >>Thx.
> >>
> >>Medvitz
> >>
> >>--
> >>PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/>
> >>To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
>
>
> --
> PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/>
> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
--
PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/>
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
