Why? Without -i a single . will terminate a message which is definitely not what we want.
-Rasmus On Mon, 27 May 2002, Yasuo Ohgaki wrote: > I don't use sendmail, but we may better to consider removing > "-i" option from default sendmail_path. > > Any comments? > > -- > Yasuo Ohgaki > > > ====== from [EMAIL PROTECTED] ======== > * Anselm Nehls <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020525 08:54]: > > > > interesstig. I'm interessted too in the right configuration > > > of php4 to work with qmail. I'm sure my php-configuration was > > > not right to use qmail. > > > > > > I found out by a maildeliveringscript. It functions by my ISP > > > that uses not qmail. But on my local host, that runs qmail > > > the script fails. In both cases the scriptcode was the same. > > > PHP itself is not right. The developers have shown that they have no > interest in the right/intelligent way to do things (esp. WRT email). > Moreover, they get all pissy with people who *do* do the right thing. Need > proof? > > [http://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=15841] > > > > to change that, open /etc/php.ini (or wherever you store your php > > configuration) and change the value of sendmail_path to > > > > sendmail_path = /var/qmail/bin/sendmail -t -i > > > Why -i? > > 67 while ((opt = getopt(argc,argv,"vimte:f:p:o:B:F:EJxb:")) != > opteof) > 68 switch(opt) { > [...] > 75 case 'i': break; /* what an absurd concept */ > > No undue offense to the poster, but this is the kind of misinformation and > inattention to detail that plagues the PHP developer's community. > > /pg > -- Peter Green : Architekton Internet Services, LLC : [EMAIL PROTECTED] > ------------------------------------------------------------- > If you ever drop your keys into a river of molten lava, let 'em go, > because, man, they're gone. (Jack Handey) > > > -- > PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/> > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php > -- PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php