At 14:28 9-7-2002, Jani Taskinen shared with all of us:
> Did you notice ext/sysvsem/sysvsem.c line 45 having > the HAVE_SEMUN defined even if it's not? Now I did :-0 However - I don't have access to a system that has semctl with 3 arguments. Anyone? > > If it's not found, it will always be set anyway.. > > --Jani > > > > >-- > >On Mon, 8 Jul 2002, Melvyn Sopacua wrote: > > >Hi, > > > >attached is a patch that checks wether sem_ctl accepts a pointer as an > >argument. It doesn't do that, on BSD/OS (maybe others?) systems. > >Patch works on BSD/OS 4.x, and verified on BSD/OS 4.2, with sample code > >on the manual notes. > > > >Met vriendelijke groeten / With kind regards, > > > >IDG.nl > >Melvyn Sopacua > >WebMaster > > > > > >--- >Incoming mail is certified Virus Free. >Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). >Version: 6.0.373 / Virus Database: 208 - Release Date: 1-7-2002 Met vriendelijke groeten / With kind regards, IDG.nl Melvyn Sopacua Webmaster -- PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
