Haven't used SNMP that heavily in the past, but I think we
don't need another mess if the API tends to differ that much
for all v3 options.
Imho there's nothing wrong with 3) here, aka pecl/snmpv3 (or
ext/whatever).
On Thu, Sep 05, 2002 at 07:35:55PM +0200, Harrie Hazewinkel wrote :
> HI,
>
> I was working on getting PHP with SNMP compiled with the
> latest NET-SNMP 5.0.4 (was UCD-SNMP). It does not work.
> I was willing to fix this problem, however, I beleive it
> could cause backwards compatibility problems if the
> UCD-SNMP must be kept.
>
> the options are (as i recognise),
> 1) drop UCD-SNMP support since the NET-SNMP is just the name change
> plus many other good features.
> 2) Make sure both work with IFDEF's.
> 3) Add an extra SNMP portion that works with NET-SNMP.
>
>
> Personnally I think 1 would be the best choice, but I have also
> created once an SNMPv3 extension for PHP with SNMP and therefore
> 3 could be choosen and have then the new SNMPv3 features.
>
>
> What do others think??
>
>
> Harrie
>
> Internet Management Consulting
> mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lisanza.net/
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> Author of MOD-SNMP, enabling SNMP management the Apache HTTP server
>
> --
> PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/>
> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
--
GnuPG Key: http://guru.josefine.at/~mfischer/C2272BD0.asc
"In short, the window belongs to me.
The document belongs to the web site designer."
- Poster on opera.wishlist
--
PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/>
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
