On Wed, 11 Sep 2002, Wez Furlong wrote: > I know this probably isn't the kind of comment you want just now, but... > If this is to support ODBC v3+, why not call the functions odbc3_xxx instead > of odbc2_xxx? I think this could help prevent some head-scratching a little > later down the track.
Well technically it's to move PHP's ODBC support further along. I've just been calling it ODBC2 locally here to make life easier when I talk to other people (as in v2 of the PHP ODBC lib). What I'm thinking I'd really like to see is ODBC move to PECL or something like that, to allow me to keep it in a different release schedule (as ODBC standards don't change that rapidly). But I've heard some complaints against such ideas, so I haven't pushed it (yet). Anyways naming convention can be changed very easily. >---------------------------------------------------------------< Dan Kalowsky "I'll walk a thousand miles just http://www.deadmime.org/~dank to slip this skin." [EMAIL PROTECTED] - "Streets of Philadelphia", [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bruce Springstreen -- PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
