+1 on removing the branch - to avoid problems with staying in sync with head
-1 on the php5 module - it'll move the sync problems to another place

Sander

On Sun, Oct 06, 2002 at 11:01:02AM +0200, Derick Rethans wrote:
> On Sun, 6 Oct 2002, Zeev Suraski wrote:
> 
> > I think that given the circumstances, we should scratch the 4.3 branch and 
> > stick to the main branch for this particular release, at least until we're 
> > very close to the release itself.  The vast majority of CVS traffic going 
> > on these days is bug fixes anyway, so creating the branch only makes it 
> > more difficult to keep up - you have to keep the two branches in sync.
> > 
> > Issuing a request for people not to develop new features for a couple of 
> > months (or telling them to develop in some -dev branch), will, in my 
> > opinion, work better than our conventional release process.  I'm very 
> > worried about sync problems with 4.3.
> 
> Maybe it's time to opening up the php5 module then... people would be 
> able to work on experimental stuff there without messing up the stable 
> module. It might be a psychological thing but I think it's appropriate 
> here.
> 
> regards,
> Derick
> 
> --
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>  Derick Rethans                                   http://derickrethans.nl/ 
>  JDI Media Solutions
> --------------[ if you hold a unix shell to your ear, do you hear the c? ]-
> 
> 
> -- 
> PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/>
> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
> 
> 

-- 
PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/>
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php

Reply via email to