On Sunday, October 13, 2002, at 09:12 PM, Stig S. Bakken wrote:
> On Mon, 2002-10-14 at 02:18, Dan Kalowsky wrote: >> While I don't have the full time to answer everything, this gets both >> a +1 >> and a -1 from me. >> >> Great idea, but PECL doesn't work everywhere, for example I believe >> OSX >> does not yet support it (that being my main platform of concern). > > If someone gives me an account on an OSX box (or even better, puts an > OSX box into my mailbox! ;-) I will make it work. Talk to Marko (Markonen on IRC). His is on a more permanent connection than mine, plus he's in a relatively same time zone as you, which should make things easier ;) >> For more information on this see an email from Marko Karripinen from >> July >> 26th 2002 detailing the original idea/method for doing this. It has >> been >> since toned down a bit, but follows the same idea. > > You're missing the point :-) Nope, I'm not. If you remember I said I'm +1 and -1 for this. The minus one being the statements said before. I don't believe jumping into using PECL without a start of a secure binary distribution method is a wise idea. And by start I mean an actual working template. But I do agree that movement forward on PECL is going to need a drastic step (i.e. what you're suggesting). >---------------------------------------------------------------< Dan Kalowsky "I got my mojo working, but it http://www.deadmime.org/~dank just ain't working on you" [EMAIL PROTECTED] - "Mojo", [EMAIL PROTECTED] Muddy Waters -- PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
