On Tue, 22 Oct 2002, Yasuo Ohgaki wrote:

> Moriyoshi Koizumi wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > I'm for Derick's option. Can I begin repacking each case to the single 
> > files now?
> 
> IMO, including script file give us more freedom to
> write/execute test script. It's not efficient creating
> normal script file when there is problem in phpt.
> 
> Anyway, if you volunteer to change it, go ahead.
> (Please don't for pgsql tests :)

tests may fail because of bugs in include, if you check functions you 
should rely as less possible on others, including include.

> 
> Please rename 001.phpt to something meaningful.
> I just followed existing test script naming convention
> and I don't like it, too.

I agree with this though.

Derick

--

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Derick Rethans                                   http://derickrethans.nl/ 
 JDI Media Solutions
--------------[ if you hold a unix shell to your ear, do you hear the c? ]-


-- 
PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/>
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php

Reply via email to