On Tue, 22 Oct 2002, Yasuo Ohgaki wrote: > Moriyoshi Koizumi wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I'm for Derick's option. Can I begin repacking each case to the single > > files now? > > IMO, including script file give us more freedom to > write/execute test script. It's not efficient creating > normal script file when there is problem in phpt. > > Anyway, if you volunteer to change it, go ahead. > (Please don't for pgsql tests :)
tests may fail because of bugs in include, if you check functions you should rely as less possible on others, including include. > > Please rename 001.phpt to something meaningful. > I just followed existing test script naming convention > and I don't like it, too. I agree with this though. Derick -- --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Derick Rethans http://derickrethans.nl/ JDI Media Solutions --------------[ if you hold a unix shell to your ear, do you hear the c? ]- -- PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php