On Friday, November 8, 2002, at 08:34 PM, tim wrote:
I cannot comment directly on the creation of ext/ibmdb2, although I'd rather see something like that moved to PECL (where everything will be eventually). As for separate CVS trees, while it sounds like a good idea, it's my opinion that it's not a good thing.If I take the existing php odbc code and add the ibm-db2 specific extensions, what are the chances of this making it into the main php distribution as a new extension ( ext/ibmdb2 ) ? Is it a good idea to maintain a separate cvs tree on sf.net so it gets some testing first?
If you can detail/outline the changes you want to make a bit more it might help in the discussion. Right now there is another user extending ODBC to better support IBM DB2 systems.
What would be the advantages of doing this? What sort of extra functionality is there that implementing such a system will provide to DB2 systems? I'm just trying to get a feel for what you're reasonings, and level of implementation will be.I am looking to create something similar to oracle's php extension.
>---------------------------------------------------------------<
Dan Kalowsky "A little less conversation,
http://www.deadmime.org/~dank a little more action."
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - "A Little Less Conversation",
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Elvis Presley
--
PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/>
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
