On Fri, 2002-11-08 at 23:41, Yasuo Ohgaki wrote:
> I don't mind making pg_fetch_object() accept object (not class)
> optionally and initialize field values as object's properties.
What you're saying would be:
$a= pg_fetch_object($q, new Article());
It is certainly not common for PHP functions to accept "new Something()"
as a parameter. Although it is sexy, does it make sense to users? Why
would a fetch function accept an instance of an object? Just my .02
EUR:-)
> How about other db module maintainers?
>
> BTW, pg_fetch_object() accepted 3rd optional parameter
> for a long time. I've disabled it recently, since having
> $obj->1, $obj->2, and so on does not make much sense.
I've done away with them. If anyone for any reason still wants them,
(object)sybase_fetch_array($q) is the way to go.
- Timm
--
PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/>
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
