That was one of the comments I was looking for "Is this really necessary?"
After all the user can certainly use explode() to take it apart. I'm not
against giving him that answer, it was just a quick patch to write...
Is that a -1 then?
> I am not so sure that adding special cases for things like mailto: and
> so on is a good idea. The code works identically to how it worked in
> 4.2.3 and prior.
>
> Ilia
>
> On November 27, 2002 04:19 pm, Sara "Pollita" Golemon wrote:
>> While waiting for opinions on Bug#20460 I went ahead and addressed
>> #20308.
>>
>> User complains that parse_url returns the full email address in 'path'
>> element. Makes reference to documents which claim it should return
>> 'user' and 'host' element.
>>
>> To address this request and maintain backward compatability I wrote a
>> patch to split the 'path' element in to 'host' and 'user' elements
>> then return all three.
>>
>> Ex:
>> *current behavior*
>> print_r(parse_url("mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]";));
>> Array (
>> [scheme] => mailto
>> [path] => [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> }
>>
>> *new behavior*
>> print_r(parse_url("mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]";));
>> Array (
>> [scheme] => mailto
>> [path] => [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> [user] => pollita
>> [host] => php.net
>> }
>>
>> If there are no objections I'll commit this change.
>>
>>
>>
--
PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/>
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
