Am Freitag, 10.01.03 um 21:02 Uhr schrieb gk:
I am trying to help with PHP. But this experience makes me feel like it is not worth it.Greg, don't make that big fuss about it. I fixed the code 15 minutes after bogusfying your report, so it throws an error, if the input is bad.
Can anyone give me some clarification.
Is there a common agreement on what constitutes a bug?
I have worked as Sr. SQA engineer for many years and have always worked under the understanding that crashes are unacceptible - no matter what caused them: code should be able to handle bad data and not crash.
See my bug report and analysis by Daniel Veillard of libxml2 at:
http://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=21477
Maybe setting it to bogus was a little bit too unfair, but my additional comments should have clarified it...
chregu
- GregDate: Fri, 10 Jan 2003 11:50:35 -0800
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: gk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Bug #21477 [Opn->Bgs]: $node->dump_node($node) crashes with libxml2-2.4.30
At 06:54 PM 1/10/2003 +0000, you wrote:
You're not in position to decide what is bogus and what is not. This is
bogus.
- Greg Keraunen -- PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
-- PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
