On Tue, 2003-01-14 at 07:48, Derick Rethans wrote: > On Mon, 13 Jan 2003, James Cox wrote: > > > > Hello, > > > > > > What do you think about the idea of Martin that would use > > > libphp.so > > > and not libphp5.so ? > > > > > it's called compatibility Nicos. having libphp4.so, libphp5.so, > > libphp6.so... and so on means that they can work together. Once libphp5.so > > gets building properly and we have moved onto that track completely, i > > intend to build a latest stable of php4 and leave it there: libphp4.so. make > > .php, .php4 etc use that hook, so my existing apps don't get broken, and > > migrate to .php5.... > > There wouldn't be any need to have them both enabled, so why even go > here?
Wouldn't there? Personally, I'd like to have both on my development server. We did it with 3/4 so it is doable to 4/5. - Stig -- PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
