On Thu, 13 Mar 2003, Andi Gutmans wrote:
> At 11:01 PM 3/12/2003 +0100, Sascha Schumann wrote:
> > > I wouldn't consider 3rd one that drastic.
> > > It has worked very well for me, I haven't got any spam
> > > to my php.net addy, but people who really wanted to send me
> > > email got through..
> >
> > Well, maybe I am an exception, but I usually don't bother to
> > "register" myself anywhere, unless there is a really good
> > reason. Thus, the proposed measure increases the bar for
> > contributions significantly.
> >
> > We don't lose anything by giving the first two items some
> > time to prove their usefullness. On the other hand, it is
> > very likely that we will lose useful input, if we implement
> > the third item prematurely.
>
> I disagree. Anyone here can handle replying because we already have the
> anti-spam protection. The only thing we're doing is adding to the message
> an explanation of the post ethics.
> I wouldn't call this drastic at all.
right... I concur
Derick
--
"my other box is your windows PC"
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Derick Rethans http://derickrethans.nl/
PHP Magazine - PHP Magazine for Professionals http://php-mag.net/
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/>
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
