On Thu, 13 Mar 2003, Andi Gutmans wrote: > At 11:01 PM 3/12/2003 +0100, Sascha Schumann wrote: > > > I wouldn't consider 3rd one that drastic. > > > It has worked very well for me, I haven't got any spam > > > to my php.net addy, but people who really wanted to send me > > > email got through.. > > > > Well, maybe I am an exception, but I usually don't bother to > > "register" myself anywhere, unless there is a really good > > reason. Thus, the proposed measure increases the bar for > > contributions significantly. > > > > We don't lose anything by giving the first two items some > > time to prove their usefullness. On the other hand, it is > > very likely that we will lose useful input, if we implement > > the third item prematurely. > > I disagree. Anyone here can handle replying because we already have the > anti-spam protection. The only thing we're doing is adding to the message > an explanation of the post ethics. > I wouldn't call this drastic at all.
right... I concur Derick -- "my other box is your windows PC" ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Derick Rethans http://derickrethans.nl/ PHP Magazine - PHP Magazine for Professionals http://php-mag.net/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php