Hi all, This is all getting a little bit heated so I’d ask people to put on the brakes slightly. Woody and Paul, we’ll reach out to you both over the next 24 hours to have a quick chat about how we could proceed in this matter, it would be preferable to resolve this in a way that all parties are happy with. If we cannot do so, then we’ll cross that bridge when we come to it.
Thanks, The Secretaries -- Michael C On 28 June 2016 at 15:49, Adam Culp <thegeeky...@gmail.com> wrote: > Rafael, > > Your words to Paul said it clearly, "...picking apart simple english..." > also applies to how you interpreted what I said when asking why one person > should step down over another. There was ZERO implications, it was an > example used in a question. > > Regards, > Adam Culp > > > > On Tuesday, June 28, 2016 at 9:26:55 AM UTC-4, Rafael Dohms wrote: >> >> >> >> On Tuesday, June 28, 2016 at 1:52:29 PM UTC+2, pmjones wrote: >>> >>> Rafael, some of your starting premises are incorrect. >>> >>> >>> > On Jun 28, 2016, at 03:08, Rafael Dohms <rdo...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> > >>> > A member >>> >>> Woody is not a voting member. >>> >>> >>> > has asked someone to step down from a position >>> >>> Woody did not ask me to step down. He appealed to others for a >>> replacement. >>> >>> >>> > in order to avoid any delays to this, we replace it with a more >>> available person" >>> >>> I am fully available and have caused no delays. Any delays, if they >>> have occurred, are due to persons other than myself. >>> >>> With those in mind, you may wish to revise your analysis. >>> >>> >> Sorry Paul, those facts, are absolutely irrelevant to me, it in now way >> affects the message or the analysis. >> Honestly this picking apart of simple english constructs and words, when >> they result make no difference, is exactly one of the counter-productive >> activities that put me off from actually being part of these discussions. >> >> The wording used by Woody matter little to me, the goal is one: "replace >> Paul from PSR". >> >> As for you being available or not, you are free to state that, I also >> refer to you being "engaged in your defense" whether that takes a few >> minutes or a few hours. >> Since we like to talk politics, this is like current impeachment in >> Brasil, let the politician focus on the defense process and take over >> his/her responsibilities. >> >> Regardless, the fact that this is becoming a "power struggle" is sad and >> says a lot more about the process. >> >> Adam, >> >> My comment was not intended to say Woody should step away >> >> >> I'm sorry but that is exactly how it came across. Woody is not the target >> of discussion, neither has he ever been reported for similar issues. >> He is also far more important to the process and his exit could actually >> cause a delay. >> >> -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "PHP Framework Interoperability Group" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to php-fig+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To post to this group, send email to php-fig@googlegroups.com. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/php-fig/cdb6f89d-354d-4032-8fb3-30b802b59bbe%40googlegroups.com > <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/php-fig/cdb6f89d-354d-4032-8fb3-30b802b59bbe%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> > . > > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PHP Framework Interoperability Group" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to php-fig+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to php-fig@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/php-fig/CAAqcDMjC86LhSvWVPh0dKGoU%3D2Yd5myEh%2BrpzKcPnp-0OFniag%40mail.gmail.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
