On 08/12/2016 02:03 PM, Paul Jones wrote:
Grey & Phil (& other interested observers):
Before analyzing the particulars of the past argument in question, I want to
make sure I understand where you're coming from.
1. Some time ago, I made an argument that you thought was wrong, and you argued
against me at the time.
2. Now, in light of a new situation, you admit that my argument back then was
right after all, and that you were wrong to argue against me.
3. Admitting now that you were wrong then, you want to use my previous argument
(which you now agree was the right one then) in this new situation.
Is that about it?
That's an impressive spin attempt, Paul, but not quite. Rather, you've
argued in the past that X should not be allowed, and blocked 2 project
applications on those grounds. You're now running for a position that
would result in you doing X (or very close to it). Grey, Phil, et al are
calling out that situational inconsistency. Calling out your change of
heart does not require anyone else to have had one.
That is, why have you changed your mind and admitted that you were wrong
then?
--Larry Garfield
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PHP
Framework Interoperability Group" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/php-fig/60ab1cec-6d66-d642-49cb-99b7188fe155%40garfieldtech.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
